<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Patrick Tulskie &#187; summize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patricktulskie.com/tag/summize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patricktulskie.com</link>
	<description>Building a Better Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:12:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter Acquired Summize &#8211; Good or Bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.patricktulskie.com/2008/07/twitter-acquired-summize-good-or-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patricktulskie.com/2008/07/twitter-acquired-summize-good-or-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Tulskie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patricktulskie.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fine folks at Twitter have been talking about a search feature for quite some time now.  They never actually pulled it off since they were busy focusing on stabilizing the platform and restoring functionality to the service.  Off in the distance, a website called Summize rose up and filled that void.  The nice thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fine folks at Twitter have been talking about a search feature for quite some time now.  They never actually pulled it off since they were busy focusing on stabilizing the platform and restoring functionality to the service.  Off in the distance, a website called Summize rose up and filled that void.  The nice thing about Summize is that it was able to provide a realtime query into what&#8217;s going on in Twitter without having to visit the actual Twitter website.  It also proved to be a solid failover for developers for when Twitter had gone down or was busy firing off whales like a mad man.  Aside from that, there was no real cap on the number of API requests one could make in a given time frame.  It just worked.  Period.</p>
<p><span id="more-17"></span></p>
<p><strong>Ok So Who Cares?<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Well the concern amongst the community right now is that this acquisition went down and it instantly broke any old Summize API requests due to the new URL redirect.  No warning was given and it just kinda happened.  With things starting off in this way, it&#8217;s no wonder that the community was feeling a little burned, spewing comments such as &#8220;RIP Summize&#8221; and other similar statements.  Feeling the heat, Alex Payne asked those following him to @reply with any concerns about the API changes as a consequence of this acquisition (http://twitter.com/al3x/statuses/859262626).  The community eagerly awaits that blog post.</p>
<p><strong>Any Real Reason for Concern?</strong></p>
<p>Looking at things right now?  No.  Twitter has been improving and Summize functions just as it used to (except for the broken API requests and new theme).  There is a great potential for the two services to feed off one another since Summize improved upon Twitter and without Twitter there is no Summize.  There is the obvious concern that having Summize under Twitter control will somehow destroy the great up-time, speed, and reliability of the searching service, but at the same time it might be possible for Twitter to take in the technology used in Summize and adapt it to make the mother service even better.</p>
<p>As a developer that uses Twitter for a number of different things, I hope we see the API for Summize largely untouched and also see the API for twitter enhanced to utilize a lot of the Summize functionality.   This will make developing applications that use Twitter much simpler.  There is an inherent risk though &#8211; if this integration does not go smoothly it has the potentional to ruin Summize and also provide Twitter no gain for their $15 million.  Let&#8217;s all hope that it works out with a great deal of improvement for everyone.</p>
<p>Alex Payne&#8217;s Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/al3x">here</a><br />
Search.Twitter Query for Summize: <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=summize">here</a><br />
Twitter Blog Post on the Aquisition: <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2008/07/finding-perfect-match.html">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patricktulskie.com/2008/07/twitter-acquired-summize-good-or-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
